Isn't any numbered list of Pokemon the "worst?"

Whoever wrote that has serious issues.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here, risk looking like the nerd I am at heart, and say that guy had it all wrong. Some of those pokemon are kickass. Some of them belong there, but some are meant to look cheesy.

And Magikarp wan't ANYWHERE on the list. He's been the lamest of the lame since the good ol' days of Red and Blue...

Even I know that Magikrap was the lamest of the lame.

Now I reveal the secret. I made it. Lol. I was bored.

You have serious issues.

Magicarp was meant to be lame though.

But Magicarp became Gyarados, which was not so lame. In fact, was awesome. So Magicarp couldnt be on a list of lame if he was a step to awesomeness.

Or something like that

I think every comedy article should end with "lol thanx for reading"

I think The New Yorker should put that at the end of every issue.

I thought they already did.

Wow, the grammar is abyssmal. You'd think a 5th grader with ADD wrote this.

Or a 9th grader with an hour on his hands.

The absolute funniest part is that this is posted under "literature".

Thanks Graham, I will sure avoid these bad pokemon.

Thats good to know troy, I finally feel like I've helped the world.