Art?

That's just mean!

Yeah, proving the age-old saying: Photographers are dicks.

Well, I don't know about proof, but it is strong anecdotal evidence.

The "artist's" crime is almost double -- I found that the link given is the second page of the exhibit; change index1.htm to index0.htm if you want to see 12 more crying toddlers...

I think his lighting/photoshopping is shit, nevermind the toddler candy thing.

*her, sorry.

Yeah, it does look hyper-real or something!

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's hilarious that at the bottom, there is a link to monkey portraits, that look very similiar to End Times.

Was it me, or was I the only one who read that as 'Headless Toddlers'?

I read the first four words of the link and decided I could be fired and arrested for clicking on it. Then I read the rest and was angered.

This woman's a biatch for other reasons. Another photographer slammed her on his blog for the same reasons you guys noted, and she went on a smear campaign against the guy:

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/06/28/photographer_calls_c.html

"Greenberg photographs distressed children, and Hawk criticized her for her methods in getting the children into a photogenic state of distress. In response, Greenberg and her husband have threatened to sue him for libel and called his employer."

So, this is classy kiddie porn then?

I thought they were funny. . .
Does that make me a child abuser?
I don't think it makes Greenburg one either, but she is a bitch. Just not a child abusing bitch.

Your failure to recognize your problem is almost as disgusting as the fact that you're proud of it.

You make me almost as sick as the photographer of the innocent children on that site.

j/k j/k j/k

It's just a dumb site. Full of topless toddlers. Perfectly innocent.

Art is so awesome.